Network Working Group M. Boucadair Internet-Draft C. Jacquenet Intended status: Standards Track Orange Expires: January 21, 2017 July 20, 2016 RADIUS Extensions for Network-Assisted Multipath TCP (MPTCP) draft-boucadair-mptcp-radius-02 Abstract One of the promising deployment scenarios for Multipath TCP (MPTCP) is to enable a Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) that is connected to multiple networks (e.g., DSL, LTE, WLAN) to optimize the usage of its network attachments. Because of the lack of MPTCP support at the server side, some service providers consider a network-assisted model that relies upon the activation of a dedicated function called: MPTCP concentrator. This document specifies a new Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) attributes that carry the IP addresses that allow CPE devices to reach one or multiple MPTCP concentrators. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on January 21, 2017. Boucadair & Jacquenet Expires January 21, 2017 [Page 1] Internet-Draft RADIUS for MPTCP July 2016 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. MPTCP RADIUS Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1. MPTCP-IPv4-Concentrator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2. MPTCP-IPv6-Concentrator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. Sample Use Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5. Table of Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1. Introduction One of the promising deployment scenarios for Multipath TCP (MPTCP, [RFC6824]) is to enable a Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) that is connected to multiple networks (e.g., DSL, LTE, WLAN) to optimize the usage of such resources, see for example [RFC4908]. Network-assisted MPTCP deployment models are designed to facilitate the adoption of MPTCP for the establishment of multi-path communications without making any assumption about the support of MPTCP by the communicating peers. This deployment scenario relies on MPTCP proxies located on both the CPE and network sides (Figure 1). MPTCP proxies are responsible for establishing multi-path communications on behalf of endpoints, thereby taking advantage of MPTCP capabilities to optimize resource usage to achieve different goals that include (but are not limited to) bandwidth aggregation, primary/backup communication paths, and traffic offload management. Boucadair & Jacquenet Expires January 21, 2017 [Page 2] Internet-Draft RADIUS for MPTCP July 2016 +------------+ _--------_ +----------------+ | | (e.g., LTE ) | | | CPE +=======+ +===+ Backbone | | (MPTCP | (_ _) | Network | | Proxy) | (_______) |+--------------+| | | IP Network #1 || Concentrator ||------> Internet | | || (MPTCP proxy)|| | | |+--------------+| | | IP Network #2 | | | | _--------_ | | | | ( e.g., DSL ) | | | +=======+ +==+ | | | (_ _) | | +-----+------+ (_______) +----------------+ | ---- LAN ---- | end-nodes Figure 1: Network-Assisted MPTCP: Reference Architecture Within this document, an MPTCP concentrator (or concentrator) refers to a functional element that is responsible for aggregating the traffic originated by a group of CPEs. This element is located in the network. One or multiple concentrators can be deployed in the network to assist MPTCP-enabled CPEs to establish MPTCP connections via their available network attachments. On the uplink path, the concentrator terminates the MPTCP connections received from its customer-facing interfaces and transforms these connections into legacy TCP connections [RFC0793] towards upstream servers. On the downlink path, the concentrator turns the legacy server's TCP connection into MPTCP connections towards its customer-facing interfaces. This document specifies two new Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS, [RFC2865]) attributes that carry the MPTCP concentrator IP address list (Section 2). In order to accommodate both IPv4 and IPv6 deployment contexts, and given the constraints in Section 3.4 of [RFC6158], two attributes are specified. Note that one or multiple IPv4 and/or IPv6 addresses may be returned to a requesting CPE. A sample use case is described in Section 3. This document assumes that the MPTCP concentrator(s) reachability information can be stored in Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) servers while the CPE configuration is usually provided by means of DHCP ([RFC2131][RFC3315]). Boucadair & Jacquenet Expires January 21, 2017 [Page 3] Internet-Draft RADIUS for MPTCP July 2016 This specification assumes an MPTCP concentrator is reachable through one or multiple IP addresses. As such, a list of IP addresses can be communicated via RADIUS. Also, it assumes the various network attachments provided to an MPTCP-enabled CPE are managed by the same administrative entity. This document adheres to [I-D.ietf-radext-datatypes] for defining the new attributes. 2. MPTCP RADIUS Attributes 2.1. MPTCP-IPv4-Concentrator Description The RADIUS MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 attribute contains the IPv4 address of an MPTCP concentrator that is assigned to a CPE. Because multiple MPTCP concentrator IP addresses may be provisioned to an authorised CPE (that is a CPE entitled to solicit the resources of a concentrator to establish MPTCP connections), multiple instances of the MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 attribute MAY be included; each instance of the attribute carries a distinct IP address. Both MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 and MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 attributes MAY be present in a RADIUS message. The MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 Attribute MAY appear in a RADIUS Access-Accept packet. It MAY also appear in a RADIUS Access- Request packet as a hint to the RADIUS server to indicate a preference, although the server is not required to honor such a hint. The MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 Attribute MAY appear in a CoA-Request packet. The MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 Attribute MAY appear in a RADIUS Accounting-Request packet. The MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 Attribute MUST NOT appear in any other RADIUS packet. Type TBA (see Section 6). Length Boucadair & Jacquenet Expires January 21, 2017 [Page 4] Internet-Draft RADIUS for MPTCP July 2016 6 Data Type The attribute MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 is of type ip4addr (Section 3.3 of [I-D.ietf-radext-datatypes]). Value This field includes an IPv4 address (32 bits) of the MPTCP concentrator. The MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 attribute MUST NOT include multicast and host loopback addresses [RFC6890]. Anycast addresses are allowed to be included in an MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 attribute. 2.2. MPTCP-IPv6-Concentrator Description The RADIUS MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 attribute contains the IPv6 address of an MPTCP concentrator that is assigned to a CPE. Because multiple MPTCP concentrator IP addresses may be provisioned to an authorised CPE (that is a CPE entitled to solicit the resources of a concentrator to establish MPTCP connections), multiple instances of the MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 attribute MAY be included; each instance of the attribute carries a distinct IP address. Both MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 and MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 attributes MAY be present in a RADIUS message. The MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 Attribute MAY appear in a RADIUS Access-Accept packet. It MAY also appear in a RADIUS Access- Request packet as a hint to the RADIUS server to indicate a preference, although the server is not required to honor such a hint. The MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 Attribute MAY appear in a CoA-Request packet. The MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 Attribute MAY appear in a RADIUS Accounting-Request packet. The MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 Attribute MUST NOT appear in any other RADIUS packet. Boucadair & Jacquenet Expires January 21, 2017 [Page 5] Internet-Draft RADIUS for MPTCP July 2016 Type TBA (see Section 6). Length 18 Data Type The attribute MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 is of type ip6addr (Section 3.9 of [I-D.ietf-radext-datatypes]). Value This field includes an IPv6 address (128 bits) of the MPTCP concentrator. The MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 attribute MUST NOT include multicast and host loopback addresses [RFC6890]. Anycast addresses are allowed to be included in an MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 attribute. 3. Sample Use Case This section does not aim to provide an exhaustive list of deployment scenarios where the use of the RADIUS MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 and MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 attributes can be helpful. Typical deployment scenarios are described, for instance, in [RFC6911]. Figure 2 shows an example where a CPE is assigned an MPTCP concentrator. This example assumes that the Network Access Server (NAS) embeds both RADIUS client and DHCPv6 server capabilities. Boucadair & Jacquenet Expires January 21, 2017 [Page 6] Internet-Draft RADIUS for MPTCP July 2016 CPE NAS AAA DHCPv6 client DHCPv6 server server | | | |---------DHCPv6 Solicit-------->| | | |----Access-Request ---->| | | | | |<----Access-Accept------| | | MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6| |<-------DHCPv6 Advertisement----| | | (OPTION_V6_MPTCP) | | | | | |---------DHCPv6 Request-------->| | | | | |<---------DHCPv6 Reply----------| | | (OPTION_V6_MPTCP) | | DHCPv6 RADIUS Figure 2: Sample Flow Example (1) Upon receipt of the DHCPv6 Solicit message from a CPE, the NAS sends a RADIUS Access-Request message to the AAA server. Once the AAA server receives the request, it replies with an Access-Accept message (possibly after having sent a RADIUS Access-Challenge message and assuming the CPE is entitled to connect to the network) that carries a list of parameters to be used for this session, and which include MPTCP concentrator reachability information (namely a list of IP addresses). The content of the MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 attribute is then used by the NAS to complete the DHCPv6 procedure that the CPE initiated to retrieve information about the MPTCP concentrator it has been assigned. Upon change of the MPTCP concentrator assigned to a CPE, the RADIUS server sends a RADIUS CoA message [RFC5176] that carries the RADIUS MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 attribute to the NAS. Once that message is accepted by the NAS, it replies with a RADIUS CoA ACK message. The NAS replaces the old MPTCP concentrator with the new one. Figure 3 shows another example where a CPE is assigned an MPTCP concentrator, but the CPE uses DHCPv6 to retrieve a list of IP addresses of an MPTCP concentrator. Boucadair & Jacquenet Expires January 21, 2017 [Page 7] Internet-Draft RADIUS for MPTCP July 2016 CPE NAS AAA DHCPv4 client DHCPv4 server server | | | |-----------DHCPDISCOVER---------->| | | |----Access-Request ---->| | | | | |<----Access-Accept------| | |MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 | |<------------DHCPOFFER------------| | | (OPTION_V4_MPTCP) | | | | | |------------DHCPREQUEST---------->| | | (OPTION_V4_MPTCP) | | | | | |<-----------DHCPACK---------------| | | (OPTION_V4_MPTCP) | | DHCPv4 RADIUS Figure 3: Sample Flow Example (2) Some deployments may rely on the mechanisms defined in [RFC4014] or [RFC7037], which allows a NAS to pass attributes obtained from a RADIUS server to a DHCP server. 4. Security Considerations RADIUS-related security considerations are discussed in [RFC2865]. MPTCP-related security considerations are discussed in [RFC6824] and [RFC6181]. Traffic theft is a risk if an illegitimate concentrator is inserted in the path. Indeed, inserting an illegitimate concentrator in the forwarding path allows to intercept traffic and can therefore provide access to sensitive data issued by or destined to a host. To mitigate this threat, secure means to discover a concentrator should be enabled. 5. Table of Attributes The following table provides a guide as what type of RADIUS packets that may contain these attributes, and in what quantity. Boucadair & Jacquenet Expires January 21, 2017 [Page 8] Internet-Draft RADIUS for MPTCP July 2016 Access- Access- Access- Challenge Acct. # Attribute Request Accept Reject Request 0+ 0+ 0 0 0+ TBA MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 0+ 0+ 0 0 0+ TBA MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 CoA-Request CoA-ACK CoA-NACK # Attribute 0+ 0 0 TBA MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 0+ 0 0 TBA MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 The following table defines the meaning of the above table entries: 0 This attribute MUST NOT be present in packet. 0+ Zero or more instances of this attribute MAY be present in packet. 6. IANA Considerations IANA is requested to assign two new RADIUS attribute types from the IANA registry "Radius Attribute Types" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/radius-types: MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv4 (TBA) MPTCP-Concentrator-IPv6 (TBA) 7. Acknowledgements Thanks to Alan DeKok for the comments. 8. References 8.1. Normative References [I-D.ietf-radext-datatypes] DeKok, A., "Data Types in the Remote Authentication Dial- In User Service Protocol (RADIUS)", draft-ietf-radext- datatypes-04 (work in progress), June 2016. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC2865] Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson, "Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 2865, DOI 10.17487/RFC2865, June 2000, . Boucadair & Jacquenet Expires January 21, 2017 [Page 9] Internet-Draft RADIUS for MPTCP July 2016 [RFC6158] DeKok, A., Ed. and G. Weber, "RADIUS Design Guidelines", BCP 158, RFC 6158, DOI 10.17487/RFC6158, March 2011, . [RFC6890] Cotton, M., Vegoda, L., Bonica, R., Ed., and B. Haberman, "Special-Purpose IP Address Registries", BCP 153, RFC 6890, DOI 10.17487/RFC6890, April 2013, . 8.2. Informative References [RFC0793] Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC 793, DOI 10.17487/RFC0793, September 1981, . [RFC2131] Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC 2131, DOI 10.17487/RFC2131, March 1997, . [RFC3315] Droms, R., Ed., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, DOI 10.17487/RFC3315, July 2003, . [RFC4014] Droms, R. and J. Schnizlein, "Remote Authentication Dial- In User Service (RADIUS) Attributes Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Information Option", RFC 4014, DOI 10.17487/RFC4014, February 2005, . [RFC4908] Nagami, K., Uda, S., Ogashiwa, N., Esaki, H., Wakikawa, R., and H. Ohnishi, "Multi-homing for small scale fixed network Using Mobile IP and NEMO", RFC 4908, DOI 10.17487/RFC4908, June 2007, . [RFC5176] Chiba, M., Dommety, G., Eklund, M., Mitton, D., and B. Aboba, "Dynamic Authorization Extensions to Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 5176, DOI 10.17487/RFC5176, January 2008, . [RFC6181] Bagnulo, M., "Threat Analysis for TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses", RFC 6181, DOI 10.17487/RFC6181, March 2011, . Boucadair & Jacquenet Expires January 21, 2017 [Page 10] Internet-Draft RADIUS for MPTCP July 2016 [RFC6824] Ford, A., Raiciu, C., Handley, M., and O. Bonaventure, "TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses", RFC 6824, DOI 10.17487/RFC6824, January 2013, . [RFC6911] Dec, W., Ed., Sarikaya, B., Zorn, G., Ed., Miles, D., and B. Lourdelet, "RADIUS Attributes for IPv6 Access Networks", RFC 6911, DOI 10.17487/RFC6911, April 2013, . [RFC7037] Yeh, L. and M. Boucadair, "RADIUS Option for the DHCPv6 Relay Agent", RFC 7037, DOI 10.17487/RFC7037, October 2013, . Authors' Addresses Mohamed Boucadair Orange Rennes 35000 France Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Christian Jacquenet Orange Rennes France Email: christian.jacquenet@orange.com Boucadair & Jacquenet Expires January 21, 2017 [Page 11]